Why the study?
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is an early manifestation of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, but few studies have addressed its clinical significance in cirrhosis.
Is left ventricular diastolic dysfunction associated with increased disease severity, complications, and poorer survival in patients with cirrhosis?
Is left ventricular diastolic dysfunction associated with increased disease severity, complications, and poorer survival in patients with cirrhosis?
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in cirrhosis is independently associated with higher disease severity, specific complications like ascites, and poorer survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LVDD may aid prognostication in cirrhosis; hypothesis-generating for screening or intervention trials.
Background: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is an early manifestation of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. Few studies have addressed its clinical significance in cirrhosis. We assessed the association of LVDD with the factors affecting cirrhosis patients' severity, complications, and survival. Methods: A total of 203 cirrhosis patients were enrolled and underwent investigations, including 2-dimensional echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging, and 139 patients with LVDD (cases) were compared with 64 patients without LVDD (controls). Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were applied. Results: Mean age was 52.76±10 years. Among LVDD patients, 56% had grade-1, and 44% had grade-2 LVDD. Cirrhosis related to NASH had a more significant association with LVDD (P<0.001) than other etiologies. LVDD was significantly associated with a greater incidence of Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class C (P<0.001), higher model for end-stage liver disease scores (P=0.001), duration of cirrhosis >2 years since diagnosis (P=0.028), ascites (P<0.001), hepatic encephalopathy (P<0.010), hepatorenal syndrome (P<0.001), and a history of obesity (P=0.004). Multivariate analysis showed that higher CTP score, ascitic fluid protein and prolonged QTc interval were independently associated with LVDD (P=0.009; P=0.018; P=0.016, respectively). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significantly poorer survival status in patients with higher grades of LVDD (P<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.78) was greatest for ascitic fluid protein in predicting LVDD, with a cutoff of >1 g/dL. Conclusions: Higher CTP score, prolonged QTc, higher ascitic fluid protein levels, and poor survival are significantly associated with LVDD. Ascitic fluid protein >1 g/dL could be an indicator for evaluating LVDD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rushil Solanki (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: