Why the study?
Information on the prognostic role of frailty and atrial fibrillation in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome was scarce.
Does frailty and atrial fibrillation status predict adverse events in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Does frailty and atrial fibrillation status predict adverse events in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome?
In elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome, frailty and overall comorbidity burden are independent predictors of adverse events at 6 months, whereas atrial fibrillation status is not.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Frailty may refine prognosis in elderly ACS beyond AF status; leaves open whether it should alter management.
BACKGROUND: There is scarce information on the prognostic role of frailty and atrial fibrillation (AF) in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: The aim was to analyse the management of elderly patients with frailty and AF who suffered an ACS using data of the prospective multicentre LONGEVO-SCA registry. We evaluated the predictive performance of FRAIL, Charlson scores and AF status for adverse events at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 531 unselected patients with ACS and above 80 years old [mean age 84.4 (SD = 3.6) years; 322 (60.6%) male] were enrolled, of whom 128 (24.1%) with AF and 145 (27.3%) with frailty. Mutually exclusive number of patients were as follows: non-frail and sinus rhythm (SR) 304 (57.2%); frail and SR 99 (18.6%); non-frail and AF 82 (15.4%); and frail and AF 46 (8.7%). Frail and AF patients compared with non-frail and SR patients had higher risk of all-cause mortality [HR 2.61, (95% CI 1.28-5.31; P = .008)], readmissions [HR 2.28, (95%CI 1.37-3.80); P = .002)] and its composite [HR 2.28, (95% CI 1.44-3.60); P < .001)]. After multivariate adjustment, FRAIL score [HR 1.41, (95% CI 1.02-1.97); P = .040] and Charlson index [HR 1.32, (95% CI 1.09-1.59); P = .003] were significantly associated with mortality. AF status was not independently related with adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty but not AF status was independently associated with follow-up adverse events. Frailty status and high Charlson index were independent conditions associated with adverse events during the follow-up. The impact of functional status has a bigger prognostic role over AF status in elderly patients with ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esteve‐Pastor et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: