PDE3 and PDE4 are the primary phosphodiesterase isoforms responsible for cAMP compartmentation following beta-2-adrenergic stimulation in frog ventricular myocytes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PDE3/4 inhibition disrupts cAMP compartmentation in frog myocytes; leaves open isoform roles in mammalian cardiomyocytes and precludes clinical inference.
The role of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) isoforms in the β(2)-adrenergic stimulation of the L-type Ca(2+) current (I(Ca,L)) was investigated in frog ventricular myocytes using double patch-clamp and double-barrelled microperfusion techniques. Isoprenaline (ISO, 1 nM to 10 μM) was applied on one half of the cell, either alone or in the presence of PDE inhibitors, and the local and distant responses of I(Ca,L) were used to determine the gradient of local vs. distant cAMP concentration (α). IBMX (100 μM), a non-selective PDE inhibitor, reduced α from 40 to 4.4 indicating a 9-fold reduction in intracellular cAMP compartmentation when all PDE activity was blocked. While PDE1 and PDE2 inhibition had no effect, PDE3 inhibition by milrinone (3 μM) or PDE4 inhibition by Ro 20-1724 (3 μM) reduced α by 6- and 4-fold, respectively. A simultaneous application of milrinone and Ro 20-1724 produced a similar effect to IBMX, showing that PDE3 and PDE4 were the major PDEs accounting for cAMP compartmentation. Okadaic acid (3 μM), a non-selective phosphatase inhibitor, or H89 (1 μM), an inhibitor of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), had no effect on the distant response of I(Ca,L) to ISO indicating that PDE activation by PKA played a minor role in cAMP compartmentation. Our results demonstrate that PDE activity determines the degree of cAMP compartmentation in frog ventricular cells upon β(2)-adrenergic stimulation. PDE3 and PDE4 subtypes play a major role in this process, and contribute equally to ensure a functional coupling of β(2)-adrenergic receptors with nearby Ca(2+) channels via local elevations of cAMP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jurevičius et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: