Key result
Sugammadex reversal in COPD is linked to ~16% lower postoperative pneumonia risk versus neostigmine.
Why the study?
Patients with COPD face an elevated risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, but whether sugammadex reduces postoperative pneumonia and COPD exacerbations compared to neostigmine was unclear.
Does sugammadex reduce 30-day postoperative pneumonia in COPD patients undergoing elective surgery compared to neostigmine?
Cohort (n=68,062)
Yes
Does sugammadex reduce 30-day postoperative pneumonia in COPD patients undergoing elective surgery compared to neostigmine?
Hazard Ratio: 0.84 (95% CI 0.75–0.94)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.8% vs 2.1%
p-value: p=.002
Sugammadex reversal in COPD patients undergoing elective surgery is associated with a reduced risk of 30-day postoperative pneumonia compared to neostigmine.
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have an elevated risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. This study investigated whether sugammadex use was associated with a reduced risk of postoperative pneumonia and COPD exacerbations compared to neostigmine in this high-risk population. This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX database to identify COPD patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia between 2015 and 2024. Patients receiving rocuronium with sugammadex reversal were compared to those receiving neostigmine reversal using 1:1 propensity score matching. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative pneumonia. Secondary outcomes included risks of COPD exacerbations, mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. After matching, 34,031 patients were analyzed per group. Sugammadex was associated with a reduced 30-day pneumonia incidence (1.8% vs 2.1%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75–0.94, P = .002) but increased ICU admissions (2.3% vs 1.9%; HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10–1.36, P < .001). No significant differences were observed in COPD exacerbations (1.1% vs 1.3%; HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79–1.04, P = .146) or mortality (0.89% vs 0.79%; HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.96–1.33, P = .147). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses revealed that benefits were more pronounced in academic centers (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.57–0.73, P < .001) and elderly patients (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68–0.84, P < .001). Effects disappeared during the 30 to 90 day follow-up. Sugammadex use in COPD patients was associated with reduced 30-day postoperative pneumonia, particularly in elderly patients and academic settings. However, this benefit did not translate to fewer COPD exacerbations and was temporally limited. The increased ICU admissions likely reflect selection bias rather than causation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n=68,062). Sugammadex vs. Neostigmine was evaluated on 30-day postoperative pneumonia (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.94, p=.002). Sugammadex reversal in COPD patients was associated with a reduced risk of 30-day postoperative pneumonia compared to neostigmine (1.8% vs 2.1%; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.94, P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: