Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The injection of syngeneic activated T cells into rodents can induce a T cell response against activation markers of the T cells, ergotopes. The responding anti-ergotypic T cells have been shown to suppress experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). This paper reports the characteristics of the anti-ergotypic response. It was found that irradiated activated T cells were as good as untreated living activated T cells in inducing anti-ergotypic cells in vivo. Glutardialdehyde-fixed (0.3%) cells were poor stimulators in vivo and non-stimulatory in vitro. Dilution of glutardialdehyde to 0.003% before fixation preserved the stimulatory capacity in vitro. Fixation or irradiation of T cells at different times after activation showed that the stimulatory ergotope appears only after more than 12 h of activation. This ergotope is not secreted by activated T cells, but is a structural component of the activated T cell. Injection of solubilized proteins from activated T cells, but not of supernatants from activated T cells, was able to induce an anti-ergotypic response in vivo. In vitro supernatants from activated T cells also were not stimulatory to anti-ergotypic T cells. The anti-ergotypic response could be measured in draining lymph nodes 3 days after injection, reached a maximum after 7-10 days and subsided thereafter. It was earlier and stronger than the anti-idiotypic response. Induction of the response was dose dependent. As few as 100 cells were able to induce a marked anti-ergotypic response. The ease of the induction and the strength of the anti-ergotypic response suggest a physiological role in immunoregulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lohse et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: