Why the study?
Does survival rate and cause of death differ based on the symptoms leading to pacemaker implantation in patients with pacemakers?
Does survival rate and cause of death differ based on the symptoms leading to pacemaker implantation in patients with pacemakers?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survival after pacemaker implantation depends significantly on the presenting symptoms, with Adams-Stokes equivalents having better survival than attacks or heart failure, highlighting the need for careful monitoring for malignant tachyarrhythmias.
The survival rate of 2256 patients with pacemakers was analyzed. Patients paced for Adams-Stokes equivalents (e.g. dizziness) showed a significantly better survival rate than did patients with pacemakers implanted for Adam-Stokes attacks or heart failure (P less than 0.0001). The estimated survival of the latter two groups did not differ significantly. Of the deceased patients who had received a pacemaker for the treatment of heart failure, 54% died due to this condition despite pacemaker implantation. The relative percentage of cases of sudden death after pacemaker implantation was high in the groups with Adams-Stokes attacks (12%) and Adams-Stokes equivalents (13%). In patients paced for Adams-Stokes attacks, sudden death occurred more frequently in the first year after pacemaker implantation (P less than 0.015) than during the following years. Therefore, increased efforts should be made to monitor patients carefully after pacemaker implantation to enable prompt detection of malignant tachyarrhythmias, probably the cause of sudden death in a substantial number of patients with pacemakers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: