Key result
Concomitant somatic afferent nerve stimulation during a 30% blood volume hemorrhage abolished the sparing of gut circulation, reducing gut blood flow and increasing vascular resistance.
Why the study?
Does somatic afferent nerve stimulation alter regional blood flow responses to hemorrhage in immature pigs?
Does somatic afferent nerve stimulation alter regional blood flow responses to hemorrhage in immature pigs?
Somatic afferent nerve stimulation mimicking injury during hemorrhage abolishes the protective sparing of gut circulation, potentially explaining the deleterious effects of injury on hypovolemia tolerance.
May explain injury-worsened hypovolemia tolerance via lost gut sparing in models; leaves open human translation.
BACKGROUND: Tissue injury modifies heart rate and blood pressure responses to hemorrhage. The effect of concomitant injury on the hemorrhage-induced redistribution of cardiac output is much less clear. However, if injury elicits the visceral alerting response of the defense reaction, then a change in this redistribution of peripheral blood flow might be expected. If such a change compromised the gut circulation, then it might explain the deleterious effects of injury on the ability to withstand hemorrhage. METHODS: Immature pigs anesthetized with Saffan were bled 30% of blood volume with or without concomitant somatic afferent (brachial) nerve stimulation (to mimic injury). In addition to global cardiovascular and oxygen transport variables, blood flow was measured in the cranial mesenteric (gut) and right femoral (skeletal muscle) arteries after a 60-minute stabilization period after surgery, at the end of the 30-minute hemorrhage, and after a 30-minute shock period. RESULTS: Hemorrhage induced the expected cardiovascular and oxygen transport changes accompanied by a reduction in skeletal muscle blood flow and a 55% increase in skeletal muscle vascular resistance, but gut blood flow and vascular resistance were unchanged. However, in the presence of brachial nerve stimulation, the pattern of response to hemorrhage was modified, such that gut blood flow was now reduced and gut vascular resistance increased. CONCLUSION: The sparing of the gut circulation after hemorrhage was abolished in the presence of "injury." This finding is consistent with injury eliciting the defense reaction and may help explain the deleterious effects of injury on resistance to hypovolemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mackway‐Jones et al. (1999) studied Hemorrhage. Somatic afferent (brachial) nerve stimulation vs. Hemorrhage without nerve stimulation was evaluated on Gut and skeletal muscle blood flow and vascular resistance. Concomitant somatic afferent nerve stimulation during a 30% blood volume hemorrhage abolished the sparing of gut circulation, reducing gut blood flow and increasing vascular resistance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: