Key result
Lung volume changes did not significantly alter perfusion in the dependent lung (P=0.51) or the height of the onset of Zone 4 behavior (P=0.23) in supine healthy subjects.
Why the study?
Does lung volume alter the distribution of pulmonary perfusion in dependent lung in supine humans?
Cross-Sectional (n=7)
Does lung volume alter the distribution of pulmonary perfusion in dependent lung in supine humans?
p-value: p=0.51
In supine humans, lung volume does not significantly alter the distribution of pulmonary perfusion in the dependent lung, suggesting extra-alveolar vessel resistance is not the primary mechanism for reduced dependent perfusion.
Lung volume changes do not appear to drive dependent perfusion in supine subjects; leaves open extra-alveolar vessel contributions and requires prospective mechanistic studies.
There is a gravitational influence on pulmonary perfusion, including in the most dependent lung, where perfusion is reduced, termed Zone 4. Studies using xenon-133 show Zone 4 behaviour, present in the dependent 4 cm at total lung capacity (TLC), affects the dependent 11 cm at functional residual capacity (FRC) and almost all the lung at residual volume (RV). These differences were ascribed to increased resistance in extra-alveolar vessels at low lung volumes although other mechanisms have been proposed. To further evaluate the behaviour of perfusion in dependent lung using a technique that directly measures pulmonary perfusion and corrects for tissue distribution by measuring regional proton density, seven healthy subjects (age = 38 ± 6 years, FEV₁ = 104 ± 7% predicted) underwent magnetic resonance imaging in supine posture. Data were acquired in the right lung during breath-holds at RV, FRC and TLC. Arterial spin labelling quantified regional pulmonary perfusion, which was normalized for regional proton density measured using a fast low-angle shot technique. The height of the onset of Zone 4 behaviour was not different between lung volumes (P = 0.23). There were no significant differences in perfusion (expressed as ml min⁻¹ g⁻¹) between lung volumes in the gravitationally intermediate (RV = 8.9 ± 3.1, FRC = 8.1 ± 2.9, TLC = 7.4 ± 3.6; P = 0.26) and dependent lung (RV = 6.6 ± 2.4, FRC = 6.1 ± 2.1, TLC = 6.4 ± 2.6; P = 0.51). However, at TLC perfusion was significantly lower in non-dependent lung than at FRC or RV (3.6 ± 3.3, 7.7 ± 1.5, 7.9 ± 2.0, respectively; P < 0.001). These data suggest that the mechanism of the reduction in perfusion in dependent lung is unlikely to be a result of lung volume related increases in resistance in extra-alveolar vessels. In supine posture, the gravitational influence on perfusion is remarkably similar over most of the lung, irrespective of lung volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hopkins et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=7). Lung volume changes (RV, FRC, TLC) vs. Comparisons between RV, FRC, and TLC was evaluated on Perfusion in dependent lung (ml min⁻¹ g⁻¹) (p=0.51). Lung volume changes did not significantly alter perfusion in the dependent lung (P=0.51) or the height of the onset of Zone 4 behavior (P=0.23) in supine healthy subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: