Key result
Two-stage revascularization with 24-hour delayed stenting and antithrombotic therapy resulted in thrombus regression in 100% of patients with acute myocardial infarction, with no cases of the no-reflow phenomenon.
Why the study?
The safety and angiographic efficacy of two-stage revascularization with PCI and stenting delayed by one day needed evaluation in patients with acute MI and massive coronary thrombosis.
Does two-stage revascularization with delayed PCI improve angiographic efficacy and safety in patients with acute myocardial infarction and massive coronary thrombosis?
Observational (n=12)
No
Does two-stage revascularization with delayed PCI improve angiographic efficacy and safety in patients with acute myocardial infarction and massive coronary thrombosis?
Delaying PCI by 24 hours with conservative antithrombotic therapy in acute MI patients with massive thrombus may safely promote thrombus regression and prevent the no-reflow phenomenon.
Aim:to investigate safety and angiographic efficacy of two-stage revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting delayed by one day in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and massive coronary thrombosis.Materials and methods.We included in this study 12 patients with massive infarct related coronary artery thrombus which length was greater than thrice the vessel diameter in the presence of TIMI grade II–III blood flow as detected by coronary angiography (CAG). The emergency PCI was not performed, and conservative antithrombotic therapy continued for 24 hours. After this day, CAG was repeated.Results.Repeat CAG in all patients showed thrombus regression which visually appeared as complete lysis in 8, and partial lysis – in 4 patients. Stenting of residual stenosis was performed in 11 patients without complications. In 1 patient residual stenosis was considered insignificant (<50 %) therefore stenting was not performed. No-reflowphenomenon and recurrent MI were not observed.Conclusion.These data suggest that in patients with massive coronary artery thrombosis conservative antithrombotic therapy for 24 hours followed by repeated CAG and, if required, by stenting of residual stenosis, is safe treatment tactics that might reduce the risk of the no-reflow phenomenon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Вышлов et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction with massive coronary thrombosis (n=12). Two-stage revascularization with 24-hour delayed stenting was evaluated on Thrombus regression and occurrence of the no-reflow phenomenon. Two-stage revascularization with 24-hour delayed stenting and antithrombotic therapy resulted in thrombus regression in 100% of patients with acute myocardial infarction, with no cases of the no-reflow phenomenon.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: