Why the study?
Does a 10% blood loss (one unit blood donation) affect auto-haemodilution and coagulation in healthy volunteers?
Does a 10% blood loss (one unit blood donation) affect auto-haemodilution and coagulation in healthy volunteers?
A rapid 10% blood loss induces a transient state of relative hypercoagulability immediately post-donation, followed by slow auto-haemodilution over 6-8 hours without enhanced coagulation.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The effect of haemodilution on coagulation has been extensively investigated. We investigated auto-haemodilution following a 10% blood loss (480 ml) and its effect on coagulation. Ten healthy, unstarved volunteers were enrolled. One unit of blood was taken from each volunteer. Concurrently blood was taken from the opposite arm prior to and immediately after the blood donation, and at 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours. It was tested for thrombelastography, haematocrit and endorphins. There was a significant decrease in r-time from the control sample to the sample taken immediately post blood donation. This value returned to baseline at 1 hour post donation and did not change again. There were no other significant changes in thromboelastographic parameters. Fractional plasma noradrenaline changes were significantly raised at 1 hour post donation (P = 0.048), returning to baseline by 2 hours post donation. The haematocrit showed a rapid (approximately 4%) fall during donation followed by a slow, but progressive decrease over six hours, falling by a mean of 8.3% from pre-donation values. A state of relative hypercoagulability is found immediately after a rapid 10% loss in circulating blood volume. This may be related to the rapid immediate haemodilution. It is unlikely that the sympathetic response to blood loss plays a role. However, after the initial drop, slow restoration of circulating blood volume by autodilution takes six to eight hours, and is not associated with enhanced coagulation. Of interest is that a 10% blood loss in a healthy person does not require volume replacement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant caution with procedures immediately after donation; leaves open effects on perioperative bleeding risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruttmann et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: