Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates how ambiguous loyalty terms trigger brand-switching in program members, indicating the risk of unstandardized preferential treatment.
Terms and conditions (T&Cs) in tourism loyalty programs are increasingly ambiguous, yet loyal members actively negotiate for preferential treatment. This research extends the firm-centric paradigm by examining how social observations of customer-initiated preferential treatment outcomes shape members’ coping responses to ambiguous T&Cs. Grounded in psychological contract theory, three experiments demonstrate that T&Cs ambiguity is associated with brand-switching, benefit-negotiation, and reduced tier-upgrade intentions via psychological contract violation. Besides, the association between ambiguity and psychological contract violation, and the indirect link between ambiguity and behavioral intention (except benefit-negotiation), are stronger following the observation of others’ granted (vs. denied) benefit negotiations. By introducing the social observation of customer-initiated preferential treatment outcomes as the boundary condition, this research uncovers how T&Cs ambiguity ruptures members’ loyalty through the lens of psychological contract violation. We urge loyalty program managers to specify ambiguous T&Cs and enforce strict frontline boundaries against negotiations to protect members’ psychological contracts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: