Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empirical study uncovers how technological failure shifts administrative burdens from bureaucracies to citizens, highlighting systemic costs in digital governance.
The impact of digital technology on administrative burdens is determined by the intricate interaction of institutional and contextual factors. This study introduces a framework that explains how technological failures produce administrative burdens for officials and citizens. Drawing on evidence from China’s digital governance, it finds that inadequate institutional support, weak coordination, and low digital literacy cause systems to become formalistic, leading to redundant procedures and overlapping evaluations. These inefficiencies, reinforced by bureaucratic hierarchies and digital intensification, push burdens downward to frontline officials, who in turn transfer them to citizens, generating additional learning, compliance, and psychological costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: