Key result
Higher surgeon or hospital volume was significantly associated with improved mortality and postoperative complications in the two largest studies of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Why the study?
Does high surgeon or hospital volume improve outcomes in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery?
Systematic Review
Does high surgeon or hospital volume improve outcomes in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery?
There appears to be a volume-outcome relationship in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery, with higher volumes associated with lower mortality and complications in large studies, though further high-quality analysis is needed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support off-pump CABG referral to high-volume centers; extends observational volume-outcome data but leaves thresholds unresolved.
A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether there is a surgeon or hospital volume-outcome relationship in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. A total of 281 papers were found using the reported searches, of which six represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, date, journal, study type, population, main outcome measures and results are tabulated. The studies found analysed the outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in relation to surgeon or hospital volume and evaluated the presence of a volume-outcome relationship. Reported measures included mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. The methodological quality and strength of each study for exploring volume-outcome relationships were quantitatively assessed using a predefined scoring system. Three studies analysed surgeon volume and three studies analysed hospital volume. The two largest and most recent studies presented a significant volume-outcome relationship in mortality and postoperative complications. Perhaps owing to the smaller sample size, this significant relationship in mortality was not observed in the four smaller studies; however, one of these studies demonstrated a significantly positive relationship for postoperative complications and another study demonstrated a similar significant relationship for the number of grafts and the degree of completeness of revascularization. While the volume-outcome relationship in coronary artery bypass graft surgery is very well-documented, the technically challenging nature of off-pump surgery, the length of the learning curve associated with the operation and the higher risk profile of patients undergoing off-pump surgery in comparison with routine on-pump surgery render these results difficult to interpret. Although our review does support the idea of a volume-outcome relationship in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery, this relationship may not be so clearly defined and requires further analysis by higher-quality studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sepehripour et al. (2012) conducted a systematic review in Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Surgeon or hospital volume was evaluated on Mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Higher surgeon or hospital volume was significantly associated with improved mortality and postoperative complications in the two largest studies of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: