Key result
Final kissing balloon technique after a 1-stent strategy for left main coronary artery crossover stenting did not significantly reduce the 5-year incidence of target lesion revascularization compared to no final kissing balloon technique (10.7% vs 14.3%; adjusted HR 0.89, P=0.72).
Why the study?
Does the final kissing balloon technique reduce target lesion revascularization in patients undergoing crossover stenting for the left main coronary artery?
Cohort (n=738)
Yes
Does the final kissing balloon technique reduce target lesion revascularization in patients undergoing crossover stenting for the left main coronary artery?
The routine use of the final kissing balloon technique after a 1-stent strategy for LMCA crossover stenting does not significantly improve 5-year clinical outcomes, including target lesion revascularization.
No support for routine final kissing balloon use after 1-stent LMCA crossover; leaves open need for randomized trials.
It is still uncertain whether the final kissing balloon technique (FKBT) is mandatory after crossover stenting for the left main coronary artery (LMCA). Assessing Optimal Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for LMCA (AOI-LMCA) registry, a 6-center retrospective registry, enrolled 1809 consecutive patients for LMCA stenting in Japan. In the present analysis, 5-year clinical outcomes were compared between non-FKBT (n = 160) and FKBT (n = 578) groups in patients treated with crossover stenting with drug-eluting stents from the LMCA to the left anterior descending artery. Propensity score-matched analysis was also performed in 160 patient pairs. In the entire study population as well as in the propensity-matched population, the cumulative 5-year incidence of the primary outcome measure (target lesion revascularization: TLR) was not significantly different between the FKBT and non-FKBT groups (10.7 versus 14.3%, P = 0.49, and 11.8 versus 14.3%, P = 0.53, respectively). In the sensitivity analysis by the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model, the effect of FKBT relative to non-FKBT for TLR remained insignificant (adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.47-1.69, P = 0.72). Regarding the TLR location, there were no significant differences in the cumulative incidences of TLR for LMCA-only, for the main branch, and for the side branch between the 2 groups (2.2 versus 1.3%, P = 0.93, 11.8 versus 9.1%, P = 0.71, and 8.2 versus 7.6%, P = 0.82, respectively). FKBT after a 1-stent strategy for LMCA crossover stenting did not affect TLR and other clinical outcomes during 5-year follow-up.Clinical Trial Registration: Assessing Optimal Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting Registry (AOI LMCA Stenting Registry). http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index/htm/ . Unique Identifier: UMIN000014706.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishida et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Left main coronary artery disease (n=738). Final kissing balloon technique (FKBT) vs. No final kissing balloon technique (non-FKBT) was evaluated on Target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 5 years (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.47-1.69, p=0.72). Final kissing balloon technique after a 1-stent strategy for left main coronary artery crossover stenting did not significantly reduce the 5-year incidence of target lesion revascularization compared to no final kissing balloon technique (10.7% vs 14.3%; adjusted HR 0.89, P=0.72).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: