Bidisomide acts as a sodium channel blocker in rat ventricular myocytes with slower dissociation kinetics than disopyramide.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution against clinical extrapolation from rat myocytes; leaves open comparative antiarrhythmic testing in vivo.
The effects of bidisomide, an antiarrhythmic agent, on sodium current (I(Na)) in isolated rat ventricular myocytes were investigated using a whole cell voltage clamp method. Bidisomide blocked I(Na) with a Ki of 214 microM at a holding potential of -140 mV. The blockade of I(Na) was enhanced at a less negative holding potential of -100 mV with a Ki of 21 microM. Bidisomide shifted the steady state inactivation curve to a negative potential direction by 20 mV without a significant change in the slope factor. Bidisomide slowed the time course of recovery of I(Na) at a holding potential of -140 mV with a slow recovery phase. The time constant of recovery phase for bidisomide, disopyramide and mexiletine were 2703, 1858 and 757 ms, respectively. The development of the block of I(Na) consisted of two phases in the presence of bidisomide. The fast and slow time constants were 11 and 648 ms. Bidisomide produced a use-dependent block of I(Na) when the depolarizing pulse was repeated at 1-3 Hz. Our results indicate that bidisomide binds to rat cardiac sodium channels and that the dissociation kinetics of bidisomide from the inactivated sodium channel is slower than that of disopyramide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Homma et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: