Key result
This editorial discusses the ongoing underrepresentation of women in clinical trials of atrial fibrillation ablation, highlighting a systematic review published in the same journal issue.
This editorial discusses the ongoing issue of underrepresentation of women in clinical trials, specifically highlighting a systematic review on atrial fibrillation ablation trials.
Equal sex and race representation in medical research has been prioritized by the National Institutes of Health for decades, starting with the establishment of the Office of Research on Women's Health in 1990. Recent developments were the introduction of the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility editorial board for all journals of the American Heart Association to foster diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility principles.1, 2 However, underrepresentation of women continues in clinical trials, including in the field of cardiology.3 The timely systematic review by Khiang et al.4 in this issue of the Journal of the American Heart Association (JAHA) investigates whether this is also the case for trials of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation, and pulmonary vein isolation ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boltze et al. (2025) conducted an editorial in Atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation ablation trials was evaluated. This editorial discusses the ongoing underrepresentation of women in clinical trials of atrial fibrillation ablation, highlighting a systematic review published in the same journal issue.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: