Why the study?
Do bipolar temporary myocardial pacing leads improve pacing and sensing reliability compared to unipolar leads in patients following open-heart surgery?
Do bipolar temporary myocardial pacing leads improve pacing and sensing reliability compared to unipolar leads in patients following open-heart surgery?
Bipolar temporary pacemaker electrodes offer more reliable pacing and sensing function than unipolar wires in the postoperative period following open-heart surgery.
Bipolar leads may enhance post-surgical reliability; hypothesis-generating and warrants randomized confirmation.
Temporary myocardial pacing leads are routinely used for diagnosis and treatment of postoperative arrhythmias following open-heart surgery. The intention of this study is to compare five different electrodes for reliability during the postoperative period. A standardised technique of implantation was used to place 147 ventricular and 81 atrial wire electrodes in 149 patients. During operation and then daily over the next ten days, the stimulation threshold, P- and R-wave sensing, and impedance were measured with a pacing system analyser to evaluate the reliability of the pacing and sensing function. Five measurements were taken at each time; the mean values were statistically analysed. The number of failures in pacing and sensing and the course of the tested parameters during the postoperative period were compared. As a result, bipolar pacing leads (Osypka TME 64a/66a) proved to be more reliable than unipolar wires (Ethicon HD 12S, Osypka TME 60/60a), particularly in atrial sensing. Also the Medtronic 6400/6500 showed good reliability for the ventricle, so that they can be recommended for VVI-mode pacing. In conclusion, for reliable function during the postoperative course up to 10 days a specially developed bipolar temporary pacemaker electrode can be recommended for both atrial and ventricular or sequential pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wirtz et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: