Key result
Drug-eluting stent implantation was associated with a higher rate of positive exercise stress tests at 1 month compared to bare metal stents.
Why the study?
Does DES compared to BMS increase the rate of positive exercise stress test in patients with CAD undergoing PCI?
Cohort (n=160)
No
Does DES compared to BMS increase the rate of positive exercise stress test in patients with CAD undergoing PCI?
DES implantation is associated with a higher rate of positive exercise stress tests at 1 month compared to BMS, and EST parameters independently predict future AMI and TVR.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May complicate early exercise test interpretation after DES; observational data leave open effects on outcomes or stent selection.
BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents (DES) have reduced restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but they seem to be associated with increased coronary endothelial dysfunction compared to bare metal stents (BMS). No data are available about the prognostic value of exercise stress test (EST) in PCI patients in the DES era. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 160 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent PCI with either BMS (n=86) or DES (n=74) were studied. EST was performed 1 month after PCI. DES patients had a higher rate of positive EST compared to BMS patients (49% vs 32%; P=0.03). At a median follow-up of 18 months DES showed a lower rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR) (hazard ratio (HR) 0.37, P=0.07), but a higher rate of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (HR 3.33, P=0.08). At multivariate Cox-regression time to 1 mm ST and low-workload ischemia were independent predictors of AMI (HR 0.96, P=0.03; and HR 6.24, P=0.009, respectively), as well as of TVR (HR 0.96, P=0.007; and HR 6.43, P=0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: DES implantation is associated with a higher rate of positive EST, compared to BMS, 1 month after PCI, likely due to a higher prevalence of endothelial dysfunction. EST seems to be helpful in predicting clinical outcome in patients with coronary stent implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nerla et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Stable coronary artery disease (n=160). Drug-eluting stents (DES) vs. Bare metal stents (BMS) was evaluated on Positive exercise stress test (EST) at 1 month (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.06-3.86, p=0.03). Drug-eluting stent implantation was associated with a higher rate of positive exercise stress tests at 1 month compared to bare metal stents.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: