Why the study?
Can Doppler tissue imaging of the mitral annulus accurately predict the histological degree of heart transplant rejection in heart transplant recipients?
Can Doppler tissue imaging of the mitral annulus accurately predict the histological degree of heart transplant rejection in heart transplant recipients?
Doppler tissue imaging of the mitral annulus is useful for excluding severe heart transplant rejection, though it lacks the specificity to reliably predict it.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid noninvasive exclusion of significant rejection post-transplant; leaves open prospective validation versus biopsy.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that diastolic mitral annular motion velocity, as determined by Doppler tissue imaging and left ventricular diastolic flow propagation velocity, is related to the histological degree of heart transplant rejection according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). METHODS: In 41 heart transplant recipients undergoing 151 myocardial biopsies, the following Doppler echocardiographic measurements were performed within one hour of biopsy: transmitral and pulmonary vein flow indices; mitral annular motion velocity indices; left ventricular diastolic flow propagation velocity. RESULTS: Late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity (A(DTI)) and mitral annular systolic contraction velocity (SC(DTI)) were higher in patients with ISHLT < IIIA than in those with ISHLT >/= IIIA (A(DTI), 8.8 cm/s v 7.7 cm/s (p = 0.03); SC(DTI), 19.3 cm/s v 9.3 cm/s (p < 0.05)). Sensitivity and specificity of A(DTI) < 8.7 cm/s (the best cut off value) in predicting significant heart transplant rejection were 82% and 53%, respectively. Early diastolic mitral annular motion velocity (E(DTI)) and flow propagation velocity were not related to the histological degree of heart transplant rejection. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler tissue imaging of the mitral annulus is useful in diagnosing heart transplant rejection because a high late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity can reliably exclude severe rejection. However, a reduced late diastolic mitral annular motion velocity cannot predict severe rejection reliably because it is not specific enough.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S-M Stengel (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: