Why the study?
Does the Syntax score correlate better with surrogate markers of atherosclerosis (cIMT and EFT) compared to the Gensini score?
Does the Syntax score correlate better with surrogate markers of atherosclerosis (cIMT and EFT) compared to the Gensini score?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Syntax score is more strongly associated with surrogate markers of atherosclerosis, such as epicardial fat tissue and carotid intima-media thickness, than the Gensini score.
Syntax score (SS) and Gensini score (GS) are used to determine the complexity and severity of coronary artery disease. Although there are some studies indicating the individual relationship of these scoring systems with the carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and epicardial fat tissue (EFT), there was no previous study that compared the SS and GS in that respect. We aimed to assess the relationship of SS and GS with predictors of atherosclerosis. We enrolled 522 patients. There were positive correlations between GS and SS tertiles with cIMT and EFT. According to multivariate linear regression analysis for GS, EFT (β: 0.035, t: 2.63, and P = .49) and cIMT (β: 0.339, t: 2.97, and P = .053) were not independently associated. For SS, EFT (β: 0.009, t: 6.5, and P = .006) and cIMT (β: 1.2, t: 10.1, and P = .001) were independently and significantly associated. We showed that the SS is significantly associated more with surrogate markers of atherosclerosis such as EFT and cIMT than the GS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalkan et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: