Why the study?
Does bethanidine reduce blood pressure and alter hemodynamics in patients with moderately severe essential hypertension?
Does bethanidine reduce blood pressure and alter hemodynamics in patients with moderately severe essential hypertension?
Bethanidine rapidly reduces blood pressure at higher doses by decreasing venous return and arteriolar dilation, but causes significant postural hypotension.
High-dose bethanidine may lower BP rapidly yet provoke marked postural hypotension; leaves open its net utility in essential hypertension pending controlled trials.
Although available elsewhere, bethanidine remains under study in the U.S. and its hemodynamic effects are unreported. Therefore, 29 patients with moderately severe essential hypertension received one of four oral dose levels (0.10, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mg/kg) of the postganglionic sympatholytic drug. Blood pressure was reduced only in the 14 patients receiving the highest dose. This was demonstrated within three hours, first by a significant postural hypotension (upright tilt: +14 before vs -19 mm Hg after, P less than 0.001). This orthostatic hypotension effect was associated with a greater fall in cardiac output (13 vs 22%, P less than 0.025) and a diminished reflective increase in total peripheral resistance (19 vs 6%, P less than 0.01); an attenuated Valsalva maneuver overshoot in the supine position was also observed (42 vs 10%, P less than 0.001). Eight of these 14 patients demonstrated supine hypotension associated with either reduced output and/or resistance. Hence, bethanidine is a rather rapidly acting oral sympatholytic agent which reduces blood pressure by producing: (1) decreasec venous return (especially in upright position), suggesting venodilation; (2) arteriolar dilation (supine and upright) reducing peripheral vascular resistance; and (3) attenuated cardiovascular sympathetic reflective adjustments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chrysant et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: