Key result
A 73-year-old female developed simultaneous cardiotoxicity and stroke-like neurotoxicity, likely due to coronary and cerebral vasospasm, within six hours of receiving her first FOLFOX infusion.
Why the study?
Simultaneous cardiotoxicity and focal neurological toxicity from 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy had not been reported previously.
Case Report (n=1)
No
5-fluorouracil-containing chemotherapy can induce simultaneous coronary and cerebral vasospasm, presenting as concurrent myocardial ischemia and stroke mimic that requires prompt recognition and drug discontinuation.
We present a case of simultaneous cardiotoxicity and stroke-like neurotoxicity in a patient treated with FOLFOX, a 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)-containing chemotherapy regimen. Within hours of FOLFOX infusion, the patient began to exhibit signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia and stroke mimic. Coronary vasoconstriction and vasospasm is a known mechanism of 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity. 5-FU-induced neurotoxicity commonly presents as encephalopathy and is likely attributable to the accumulation of ammonia, a product of 5-FU metabolism. However, our patient presented with focal neurological signs and normal levels of ammonia. This suggests that 5-FU-induced vasospasm in the coronary arteries and cerebral vasculature is a likely cause of the simultaneous cardiac and neurological events we report here which have not been reported previously. Recognition of these toxicities as complications of 5-FU chemotherapy is crucial for the proper diagnosis and treatment of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ray et al. (2020) conducted a case report in Stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma (n=1). FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil containing chemotherapy) was evaluated on Simultaneous cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity. A 73-year-old female developed simultaneous cardiotoxicity and stroke-like neurotoxicity, likely due to coronary and cerebral vasospasm, within six hours of receiving her first FOLFOX infusion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: