Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 1990Clinical CardiologyOpen Access

Dipyridamole thallium imaging may not be a reliable screening test for coronary artery disease in patients undergoing vascular surgery

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Dipyridamole SPECT thallium imaging failed to identify 7 of 10 patients with perioperative coronary events, showing poor predictive accuracy for routine preoperative risk stratification.

Why the study?

Does preoperative dipyridamole thallium imaging reliably predict perioperative coronary events in patients undergoing vascular surgery?

Population

86 patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures

Comparison

Preoperative dipyridamole SPECT thallium imaging vs Preoperative clinical assessment

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

perioperative

Authors

Thomas H. Marwick
Thomas H. MarwickCardiac Imaging
DUD. A. UnderwoodUniversity of Victoria

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Does not support routine preoperative use; leaves open the need for validated alternatives in vascular surgery patients.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=86)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does preoperative dipyridamole thallium imaging reliably predict perioperative coronary events in patients undergoing vascular surgery?

P
Population
86 patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures evaluated for perioperative coronary events using preoperative clinical assessment and dipyridamole SPECT thallium imaging.
E
Exposure
Preoperative dipyridamole SPECT thallium imaging (DST)
C
Comparator
Preoperative clinical assessment
O
Outcome
Perioperative coronary event (unstable angina, myocardial infarction, or cardiac death)hard clinical

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 16% vs 14%

Dipyridamole thallium imaging is not an ideal routine noninvasive technique for preoperative cardiac risk stratification in patients undergoing vascular surgery, as it failed to identify the majority of patients who suffered perioperative coronary events.

Limitations

  • Application of the test to a low to moderate risk population may have lowered its predictive accuracy for coronary events.
  • Application of the test to a low to moderate risk population may be responsible for its lower predictive accuracy

Cite This Study

Marwick et al. (1990) conducted a cohort in Peripheral vascular surgery (n=86). Dipyridamole SPECT thallium imaging (DST) vs. Preoperative clinical assessment was evaluated on Perioperative coronary event (unstable angina, myocardial infarction, or cardiac death). Dipyridamole SPECT thallium imaging failed to identify 7 of 10 patients with perioperative coronary events, showing poor predictive accuracy for routine preoperative risk stratification.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8db40d3974254b714ac44dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960130105
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dipyridamole-Thallium Scanning in Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery1987 · 298 citations
  2. 2Combining Clinical and Thallium Data Optimizes Preoperative Assessment of Cardiac Risk before Major Vascular Surgery1989 · 729 citations
  3. 3The Declining Specificity of Exercise Radionuclide Ventriculography1983 · 318 citations
  4. 4Fatal Myocardial Infarction Following Carotid Endarterectomy1981 · 159 citations
  5. 5Fatal Myocardial Infarction Following Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Resection1980 · 180 citations