Key result
Abnormal hearing patterns were not significantly associated with impaired brachial flow-mediated dilation or increased carotid intima-media thickness after adjusting for age and sex.
Why the study?
Prior data suggest associations between hearing loss, CV risk factors, and CV disease, but whether specific hearing loss patterns are associated with systemic endothelial dysfunction and carotid IMT remains unclear.
Are abnormal hearing patterns associated with impaired brachial FMD and increased carotid IMT in adults without prevalent cardiovascular disease?
Observational (n=1,672)
Are abnormal hearing patterns associated with impaired brachial FMD and increased carotid IMT in adults without prevalent cardiovascular disease?
Abnormal hearing patterns are not independently associated with systemic endothelial dysfunction or increased carotid intima-media thickness after adjusting for age and sex.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests hearing loss is not an independent marker of subclinical atherosclerosis; leaves open whether other.
Introduction: Prior data suggest associations between hearing loss, cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, and CV disease. Whether specific hearing loss patterns, including a strial pattern associated with inner ear vascular disease, are associated with systemic endothelial dysfunction and carotid intima–media thickness (IMT) remains unclear. Methods: We evaluated participants without prevalent CVD in the Framingham Offspring Study who underwent formal audiogram testing and brachial and carotid artery ultrasounds. Audiograms were categorized as normal or as belonging to one of four abnormal patterns: cochlear-conductive, low-sloping, sensorineural, or strial. Endothelial function as measured by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMDmm and FMD%). Internal and common intima–media thicknesses (icIMT and ccIMT, respectively) were compared between audiogram patterns. Results: We studied 1672 participants (mean age 59 years, 57.6% women). The prevalence of each hearing pattern was as follows: 43.7% normal; 20.3% cochlear-conductive; 20.3% sensorineural; 7.7% low-sloping; and 8.0% strial. Strial pattern hearing loss was nearly twice as prevalent ( p = 0.001) in those in the highest quartile of ccIMT and nearly 50% higher in those in the highest icIMT quartile ( p = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences between the prevalence of the strial pattern comparing the lowest quartiles of FMDmm and FMD% with the upper three quartiles. Age- and sex-adjusted linear regression models did not show significant associations between the vascular measures and hearing patterns. Conclusion: Abnormal hearing patterns were not significantly associated with impaired brachial FMD and increased carotid IMT after adjusting for age and sex effects, which may reflect age and sex-related distributional differences based on hearing loss pattern.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study conducted an observational in Hearing loss (n=1,672). Abnormal hearing patterns vs. Normal hearing pattern was evaluated on Endothelial function (brachial artery flow-mediated dilation) and carotid intima-media thickness. Abnormal hearing patterns were not significantly associated with impaired brachial flow-mediated dilation or increased carotid intima-media thickness after adjusting for age and sex.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: