Why the study?
Does the measurement of different D-dimer kits accurately diagnose subclinical DVT or predict postoperative DVT in orthopedic surgery patients?
Does the measurement of different D-dimer kits accurately diagnose subclinical DVT or predict postoperative DVT in orthopedic surgery patients?
Different D-dimer assays have varying cutoff values for predicting postoperative DVT, highlighting the need for kit-specific thresholds in clinical practice.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
D-dimer cutoffs require cautious preoperative use in orthopedics; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The cutoff values of D-dimer levels for diagnosing or predicting the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were evaluated in preoperative patients and compared to those in non-DVT patients. The levels of 8 different D-dimers were measured using the latex agglutination method or enzyme immunoassay before surgery in 262 orthopedic surgery patients to diagnose subclinical DVT or predict postoperative DVT. There were 15 patients with subclinical DVT and 47 with postoperative DVT, but 200 patients had no DVT at all. All 8 plasma D-dimer values were significantly higher in the patients with subclinical or postoperative DVT than in those without DVT or in healthy volunteers. There were differences in the cutoff values between the assays highly sensitive for low D-dimer levels and wild-range assays of D-dimers. Some D-dimer assays might therefore be more useful than others for diagnosing low levels of D-dimer. Although the measurement of D-dimer levels was useful for diagnosing subclinical DVT and predicting the risk of DVT, the cutoff values for the diagnosis or prediction of DVT varied. The cutoff values for the prediction of postoperative DVT were ≥1.7 µg/mL (D-dimer A-D) and ≥1.0 µg/mL (D-dimer E-H).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasegawa et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: