Why the study?
Does daily monitoring of intrathoracic impedance and body weight predict decompensation in heart failure patients?
Does daily monitoring of intrathoracic impedance and body weight predict decompensation in heart failure patients?
Intrathoracic impedance monitoring predicts heart failure decompensations with higher sensitivity and fewer unexplained detections than daily body weight monitoring.
Impedance and weight changes may signal impending HF decompensation; hypothesis-generating for telemonitoring pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Decompensation is frequent in heart failure (HF) patients and predicts poor prognosis. HYPOTHESIS: Volume-overload events in HF patients are preceded by changes in intrathoracic impedance (Z) and body weight (BW); monitoring these parameters may be useful to predict decompensation. METHODS: Forty-three HF patients (LVEF 25% ± 12%) with a recent HF event and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator providing daily Z were equipped with telemonitoring scales submitting daily BW. Changes in BW and Z 30 days prior to major (HF hospitalization) and minor (ambulatory adjustment of diuretics) were analyzed. RESULTS: During median of 427 days follow-up 25 major and 41 minor events occurred. Z decreased by -4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: CI -6.7 to -3.0) and -4.3 (95% CI: -5.5 to -3.2) within 30 days prior to major and minor events respectively (P < 0.001). BW increased before major events by 2.3 kg (95% CI: 1.0 to 3.5, P < 0.01) and minor events 1 kg (95% CI: 0.5 to 1.4, P < 0.001). Sensitivity of Z for major/minor HF events was 83.3% (95% CI: 71.7 to 91.0) and for BW 43.9% (95% CI: 31.9 to 56.7). The unexplained detection rate per patient-year was 1.6 (interquartile range [IQR], 0-3.1) for Z and 4.8 (IQR 1.6-11.1) for BW. Combined Z and BW sensitivity was 42.4% (95% CI: 30.6 to 55.2) and unexplained detection rate was 0.8 (IQR, 0-1.5) per patient-year. CONCLUSIONS: Decompensation is marked by a decrease in Z and increase in BW the preceding 30 days. Monitoring of Z predicts HF decompensations with better sensitivity and lower unexplained detection rate than BW.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guðmundsson et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: