Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Superconductivity has advanced considerably since the discovery of high-field, type-II superconductors in 1961. During the past two years, superconductivity has at last become a tool of high-energy physics. One may now consider the construction of a superconducting proton synchrotron. Several laboratories in the United States and Europe are studying the feasibility of superconducting synchrotrons. A realistic look at such a synchrotron requires a study of the machine components and their interaction, and a study of the fundamental properties of such a machine. Economics will be the principal reason for ultimately building such a machine. Since the magnet system is the primary difference between superconducting and conventional machines, it will be emphasized in the report. There will be a short discussion of magnet coil configurations, superconducting materials, and the use of iron as a magnetic shield and return path. The magnet system consists of a power supply, cryostat, and a refrigeration system. All components are discussed in some detail. The use of superconducting synchrotron magnets permits one to consider a number of alternative solutions to RF, vacuum, and injection and extraction problems. Changes in the enclosure and other conventional facilities for a superconducting machine are discussed. A rough cost estimate of superconducting synchrotrons is presented. The effect of field, beam intensity, and repetition rate on cost is discussed. In conclusion, this report shows that a superconducting synchrotron is both feasible and economical.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael A. Green (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: