Valve replacement in children under 14 years of age, primarily using Starr-Edwards prostheses, is associated with acceptable mortality and good long-term functional outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports consideration of valve replacement in young children; leaves open durability and applicability of contemporary prostheses.
From 1964 to 1986, a total of 18 valve replacement operations were performed in 15 children under 14 years of age, with 13% operative mortality. Eleven children had a mitral valve replacement, with 3 subsequently requiring reoperation. Twelve Starr-Edwards caged ball prostheses, 1 Björk-Shiley and 1 Carpentier-Edwards prosthesis were implanted in the mitral position, with 18% operative mortality. Three children underwent aortic valve replacement, 1 with a Björk-Shiley prosthesis and 2 with a Starr-Edwards. One patient had tricuspid valve replacement utilizing a Starr-Edwards valve. Thirteen patients had one or more cardiac operations prior to valve replacement. Two late deaths occurred 8 and 18 months, respectively, group, 1 from a cardiac arrhythmia and 1 from fulminating prosthetic valve endocarditis. There were no late deaths in other patients. There was one thromboembolic episode in the entire group. At follow-up, 10 patients were classified as New York Heart Association Functional Class I and 1 patient was Class III. Valve replacement in children can be carried out with low mortality and good long-term results using the Starr-Edwards caged ball prosthesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guvendik et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: