July 1, 1996Journal of Clinical MicrobiologyOpen Access

Rapid diagnosis of poliovirus infection by PCR amplification

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

Does a single-tube reverse transcription-PCR assay accurately detect polioviruses compared to conventional neutralization assays?

Population

163 virus isolates

Comparison

Single-tube, single-primer-set reverse… vs Conventional techniques (neutralization assays)

Design

Other

Authors

CCCarlo ChezziUniversity of Parma

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Supports rapid poliovirus detection in isolates; leaves open validation for clinical specimens and genotyping.

Structured PICO

Does a single-tube reverse transcription-PCR assay accurately detect polioviruses compared to conventional neutralization assays?

Population

163 virus isolates (125 typed as polioviruses and 38 typed as non-polio enteroviruses by conventional techniques)

Intervention

Single-tube, single-primer-set reverse transcription-PCR assay targeting the VP1-2A region

Comparator

Conventional techniques (neutralization assays)

Outcome

Detection of poliovirusessurrogate

A novel RT-PCR assay provides rapid, highly sensitive, and specific detection of polioviruses, with potential for direct genotype analysis.

Cite This Study

Carlo Chezzi (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a90701efdb099d0d8dd8665 https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.34.7.1722-1725.1996

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Rapid diagnosis of poliovirus infection by PCR amplification

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Rapid diagnosis of poliovirus infection by PCR amplification

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider