Why the study?
Does stationary phantom correction improve the accuracy of CMR flow mapping in patients with congenital heart disease?
Population
31 patients with congenital heart disease, median age 23 years.
Comparison
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase velocity… vs Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase velocity…
Design
Cross-sectional, Retrospective review was blinded to initial technical and…
Authors
Loading...
Phantom correction may prevent shunt misclassification on congenital CMR; leaves open whether routine use improves outcomes.
Does stationary phantom correction improve the accuracy of CMR flow mapping in patients with congenital heart disease?
Stationary phantom correction during CMR flow mapping significantly alters the clinical classification of shunts and regurgitant fractions in patients with congenital heart disease, highlighting the need to correct for background flow errors.
Miller et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: