Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have compared the activity of several Kd- or Ld-restricted antigenic peptides as competitors in a functional competition assay using cytolytic T lymphocyte (CTL) clones. All of four unrelated Kd-restricted peptides tested could compete with each other but not with the Ld-restricted peptide P91A-. 12-24 (P91A). Moreover, the P91A peptide failed to compete with the four Kd-restricted peptides. In contrast, another Ld-restricted peptide [mouse cytomegalovirus (MCMV) pp89 167-176] could clearly compete with both Kd- and Ld-restricted peptides. The comparison of a series of modified MCMV pp89 peptides suggested that distinct structural features allow the interaction of the peptide with the two different MHC class I molecules. We showed previously that the competitor activity of two different Kd-restricted antigenic peptides was reduced substantially upon Ala substitution of the single Tyr residues present in these peptides. We now show a similar effect for two additional Kd-restricted peptides. Our results thus suggest that Tyr may function as an 'anchor' residue for many antigenic peptides that bind to the Kd molecule. Molecular modeling of the presumed antigen-binding site of the Kd molecule revealed the presence of two deep cavities that may be involved in binding peptide amino acid side chains. A model illustrating one possible interaction of a Tyr-containing peptide with the Kd molecule is presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maryanski et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: