Key result
The GORE CARDIOFORM ASD occluder achieved 96% technical implant success and 100% closure success at 6 months, with a 4.8% serious adverse event rate.
Why the study?
Existing transcatheter ASD closure devices have known limitations, including device erosion with retro-aortic rim deficiency and size constraints for defects 18 mm or larger.
Does the GORE CARDIOFORM ASD occluder safely and effectively close atrial septal defects in patients with ASD?
Observational (n=125)
Yes
Does the GORE CARDIOFORM ASD occluder safely and effectively close atrial septal defects in patients with ASD?
The GORE CARDIOFORM ASD occluder demonstrated high technical and closure success rates with an acceptable safety profile, supporting its use for transcatheter ASD closure.
May expand ASD closure eligibility for rim-deficient or large defects; leaves open confirmation of safety versus approved devices in randomized trials.
OBJECTIVE: Assess clinical performance of a new device for transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD). BACKGROUND: Previously-approved ASD Closure devices have known limitations. Device erosion has been associated with the AMPLATZER® septal occluder in patients with retro-aortic rim deficiency (<5 mm), while defects ≥18 mm are too large for the GORE® CARDIOFORM septal occluder. The GORE® CARDIOFORM ASD occluder (GCA), a hybrid of the approved devices, was designed to expand the eligible ASD population. METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-five ASD patients were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter registry. Descriptive clinical endpoints included: technical implant success, closure success, serious adverse events (SAE), clinically significant new arrhythmia, and wire frame fracture. Procedural outcomes and adverse events were adjudicated by an Echocardiography Core Lab and Independent Data Review Board, respectively. RESULTS: Median subject age was 12.3 years (range 2.9-84.7), with 72% of patients ≤18 years old. Median ASD stop-flow diameter was 17.0 mm (8.0-30.0), with 43% ≥18 mm. Deficient retro-aortic rim occurred in 57% of subjects, and 30% had both diameter ≥ 18 mm and deficient rim. Technical Implant Success was achieved in 120/125 (96%), though three devices were removed within 24 hr. At the scheduled 6-month evaluation, 112/117 returned for evaluation. All 112 had closure success. SAE occurred in 6/125 (4.8%) and 6/125 (4.8%) had clinically significant new arrhythmia. Wire frame fractures occurred in 37/104 (36%), without any associated clinical sequelae, residual shunt, or device instability. CONCLUSION: The GCA performed effectively and safely in this initial cohort, and led to FDA approval based on this data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sommer et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial septal defect (ASD) (n=125). GORE CARDIOFORM ASD occluder (GCA) was evaluated on Technical implant success. The GORE CARDIOFORM ASD occluder achieved 96% technical implant success and 100% closure success at 6 months, with a 4.8% serious adverse event rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: