Why the study?
Demand for non-invasive blood pressure monitoring is increasing, but the accuracy and stability of results from current measurement techniques remain controversial.
Does a novel method combining PPG and oscillometric morphology accurately measure NIBP compared to commercial devices in volunteers?
Does a novel method combining PPG and oscillometric morphology accurately measure NIBP compared to commercial devices in volunteers?
A novel NIBP measurement method combining PPG and oscillometric morphology shows good correlation with established commercial devices.
Novel NIBP method needs prospective validation before home use; leaves open whether accuracy and stability improve on existing techniques.
The demand for monitoring non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) parameters in health facilities for medical examination and treatment, specifically self-monitoring at home is significantly increasing. The measurement methods are based on many different techniques. However, the accuracy and stability of the measurement results from these techniques are still controversial. In this study, we proposed a novel method to measure the two most important parameters in NIBP measurement by combining two techniques: observing the Photoplethysmogram (PPG) signal to determine the Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and analyzing the changes of the morphology of oscillometric pulses to determine the Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP). The results were attained from 30 volunteers by using the proposed model and two commercial NIBP devices from iChoice and Omron for comparison. The measuring results of the proposed model have shown a good correlation and high stability of SBP, DBP (Diastolic Blood Pressure) and MAP measurements compared to the current techniques, expressed by the correlation of determination R2, the mean difference of proposed model to each commercial device, NIBPP – NIBPiC, NIBPP – NIBPO, and the mean (SD) between measurement results of volunteers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duy et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: