Key result
LA peak systolic strain accurately identifies pediatric cardiomyopathy with an AUC of ~0.98.
Why the study?
2-D LA strain accurately categorizes LV diastolic dysfunction in adults, but its role in diagnosing and classifying diastolic dysfunction in children with dilated, hypertrophic, and restrictive cardiomyopathies was unknown.
Does 2-dimensional speckle-tracking left atrial strain and strain rate accurately diagnose and classify diastolic dysfunction in children with dilated, hypertrophic, and restrictive cardiomyopathies compared to conventional echocardiography?
Case-Control (n=136)
Single-blind (2-D speckle-tracking echocardiographic analyses performed by a paediatric cardiologist blinded to clinical and standard echo Doppler data)
No
Does 2-dimensional speckle-tracking left atrial strain and strain rate accurately diagnose and classify diastolic dysfunction in children with dilated, hypertrophic, and restrictive cardiomyopathies compared to conventional echocardiography?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
2-D speckle-tracking left atrial strain and strain rate progressively decrease with worsening diastolic dysfunction and strongly correlate with invasive LV end-diastolic pressure in children, offering superior discrimination of pediatric cardiomyopathies compared to conventional echo-Doppler parameters.
Background: Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (DD) carries worse prognosis in childhood. 2-dimensional (2-D) left atrial (LA) strain accurately categorizes DD in adults but its role in children is unknown. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate whether LA strain and strain rate could diagnose and classify DD in children with dilated (CMD), hypertrophic (HCM) and restrictive (RCM) cardiomyopathies (CM). Methods and Results: The study includes 136 children (aged 8.8 ± 6 years): 44 with DCM, 40 with HCM, 7 with RCM and 45 healthy controls (CTRL). They underwent standard echocardiographic examination and 2-D speckle-tracking analyses (LV longitudinal peak systolic strain (LS), LA peak systolic strain and strain rate). No significant differences in mitral E/A and pulmonary S/D ratios were observed among the four groups. Although E/E’ and indexed left atrial volumes were found to be significantly higher in HCM, DCM and RCM compared to CTRL (p < 0.001), they showed no significant difference among the three CM groups. LV LS values were significantly reduced in CM vs CTRL (p < 0.001) and in DCM vs HCM (p < 0.01), with no other differences between the remaining groups. LA peak systolic strain and strain rate values showed a steady and significant decrease with worsening of DD. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves showed area under the curve of 0.976 (p < 0.001) for LA strain and 0.946 (p < 0.001) for LA strain rate, to distinguish CTRL from CMs. Conclusions: LA strain and strain rate could be a promising tool to better understand and classify DD in children with cardiomyopathies, opening the way to its clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabatino et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in Pediatric dilated (DCM), hypertrophic (HCM), and restrictive (RCM) cardiomyopathies (n=136). 2-dimensional speckle-tracking left atrial (LA) peak systolic strain and strain rate vs. Healthy controls and standard echo-Doppler diastolic parameters was evaluated on Diagnostic discrimination of pediatric cardiomyopathies (diastolic dysfunction) from healthy controls using ROC analysis of LA peak systolic strain (AUC 0.976, p=<0.001). 2-D speckle-tracking left atrial peak systolic strain accurately distinguished children with cardiomyopathies from healthy controls and correlated with invasive LVEDP.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: