Key result
Higher central systolic blood pressure and central pulse pressure, but not brachial blood pressure, were significantly associated with white matter hyperintensity volume (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Elevated blood pressure is a known risk factor for silent brain disease, but the association between central blood pressure and silent cerebrovascular disease has not been clearly established.
Is central blood pressure more strongly associated with subclinical cerebrovascular disease than brachial blood pressure in older adults?
Cohort (n=993)
Is central blood pressure more strongly associated with subclinical cerebrovascular disease than brachial blood pressure in older adults?
Central blood pressure is more strongly associated with white matter hyperintensity volume than brachial blood pressure, highlighting its potential utility in assessing cerebrovascular risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Central BP may better reflect cerebrovascular risk than brachial BP in older adults; hypothesis-generating for targeted trials before practice change.
Elevated blood pressure (BP) level is one of the most consistently identified risk factors for silent brain disease. BP values obtained at the proximal segment of the aorta (central BP) are more directly involved than brachial BP in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. However, the association between central BP and silent cerebrovascular disease has not been clearly established. Participants in the CABL (Cardiovascular Abnormalities and Brain Lesions) study (n=993; mean age, 71.7±9.3 years; 37.9% men) underwent 2-dimensional echocardiography, arterial wave reflection analysis for determination of central BPs, and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Central BPs were calculated from the radial pulse waveform. Subclinical silent cerebrovascular disease was defined as silent brain infarction and white matter hyperintensity volume. Both brachial ( P =0.014) and central pulse pressure ( P =0.026) were independently associated with silent brain infarctions after adjustment for clinical variables, but not adjusting for each other. None of the brachial BP values was associated with upper quartile of white matter hyperintensity volume in multivariable analysis. Both central systolic BP ( P <0.001) and central pulse pressure ( P <0.001) were significantly associated with upper quartile of white matter hyperintensity volume in multivariable analysis, even after adjustment for brachial BP. In a predominantly older population-based cohort, both brachial and central pulse pressure were independently associated with silent brain infarction. However, higher central systolic BP and central pulse pressure, but not brachial BP, were significantly associated with white matter hyperintensity volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsumoto et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Subclinical cerebrovascular disease (n=993). Central blood pressure (central systolic BP and central pulse pressure) vs. Brachial blood pressure was evaluated on Silent brain infarction and white matter hyperintensity volume (p=<0.001). Higher central systolic blood pressure and central pulse pressure, but not brachial blood pressure, were significantly associated with white matter hyperintensity volume (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: