Key result
Flow-mediated vasodilation was impaired in all systemic sclerosis patients compared to healthy controls, with no significant improvement observed across different treatment regimens.
Why the study?
Comparative analysis of flow-mediated dilation and vasoactive angiogenic and fibrogenic mediators between treatment-naive and treated systemic sclerosis patients was an unmet need.
Does vasodilator and immunosuppressive therapy improve endothelial dysfunction in patients with systemic sclerosis?
Cross-Sectional (n=76)
Single-blind
No
Does vasodilator and immunosuppressive therapy improve endothelial dysfunction in patients with systemic sclerosis?
Endothelial dysfunction persists in systemic sclerosis patients despite vasodilator and immunosuppressive therapy, potentially driven by an unaltered NO/ET1 ratio.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Persistent endothelial dysfunction persists in SSc despite therapy; leaves open whether NO/ET-1 balance is a modifiable target.
Background: A comparative analysis of flow-mediated-vasodilation (FMD), vasoactive angiogenic, and fibrogenic mediators between treatment-naive and treated Systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients is an unmet need.Aim and Objective: 1) To assess the FMD and different pathogenic mediators in SSc patients [treatment naïve (Group-I, n=24) on vasodilator (Group-II, n=10), on vasodilator + immunosuppressive (Group-III, n=22)], and in healthy control (HC), n= 20]. To assess the proportion of circulating Endothelial cells in Group-I.Materials and method: FMD was measured in all the participants. Serum levels of NO, ET1, NO/ET1, sVCAM, sICAM, TGFβ, IL-6, VEGF were measured along with the gene expressions of eNOS, iNOS, ET-1, TGFβ. CEC was measured in Group-I and HC. Results: FMD was significantly decreased in all SSc patients though receiving treatment.Upregulation of serum NO and ET concentrations were noted post-treatment with an unaltered NO/ET1 ratio. NO was positively correlated with FMD (r= 0.6), and negatively with TGFβ (r=-0.5). ET-1 showed less correlation with TGFβ (r=-0.5) but no significant correlation with FMD. Circulating endothelial cell (CEC) was significantly higher in Group-I (3.2%) than HC (0.8%) (p = 0.002), and it showed a good correlation with NO (r=-0.7, p=0.0001) and NO/ET1 (r=-0.6,p=0.007).Conclusion: Endothelial dysfunction was seen in SSc patients irrespective of treatment which might be due to the unaltered NO/ET1. NO might be the major driving molecule in the vascular pathophysiology of SSc.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhattacharjee et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Systemic Sclerosis (n=76). Vasodilator and/or immunosuppressive therapy vs. Treatment-naive SSc patients and healthy controls was evaluated on Flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (p=<0.0001). Flow-mediated vasodilation was impaired in all systemic sclerosis patients compared to healthy controls, with no significant improvement observed across different treatment regimens.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: