Key result
Varying-speed CF-LVAD assistance synchronous with the cardiac cycle doubled the index of pulsatility in arterial pressure and pump flow rate compared to constant speed support in an ex-vivo model.
Why the study?
Does a varying-speed CF-LVAD synchronous with the cardiac cycle improve arterial pulsatility compared to a constant speed CF-LVAD in an ex-vivo model?
Does a varying-speed CF-LVAD synchronous with the cardiac cycle improve arterial pulsatility compared to a constant speed CF-LVAD in an ex-vivo model?
Regulating CF-LVAD pump speed over a cardiac cycle can double arterial pulsatility without compromising overall hemodynamic support in an ex-vivo model.
Ex-vivo pulsatility gains warrant in-vivo testing of synchronous CF-LVAD speed modulation; leaves open translation to patient outcomes.
Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) reduce arterial pulsatility, which may cause long-term complications in the cardiovascular system. The aim of this study is to improve the pulsatility by driving a CF-LVAD at a varying speed, synchronous with the cardiac cycle in an ex-vivo experiment. A Micromed DeBakey pump was used as CF-LVAD. The heart was paced at 140 bpm to obtain a constant cardiac cycle for each heartbeat. First, the CF-LVAD was operated at a constant speed. At varying-speed CF-LVAD assistance, the pump was driven such that the same mean pump output was generated. For synchronization purposes, an algorithm was developed to trigger the CF-LVAD each heartbeat. The pump flow rate was selected as the control variable and a reference model was used for regulating the CF-LVAD speed. Continuous and varying-speed CF-LVAD assistance provided the same mean arterial pressure and flow rate, while the index of pulsatility doubled in both arterial pressure and pump flow rate signals under pulsatile pump speed support. This study shows the possibility of improving the pulsatility in CF-LVAD support by regulating pump speed over a cardiac cycle without compromising the overall level of support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bozkurt et al. (2014) studied Heart failure requiring left ventricular assist device. Varying-speed CF-LVAD assistance synchronous with the cardiac cycle vs. Constant speed CF-LVAD assistance was evaluated on Index of pulsatility in arterial pressure and pump flow rate signals. Varying-speed CF-LVAD assistance synchronous with the cardiac cycle doubled the index of pulsatility in arterial pressure and pump flow rate compared to constant speed support in an ex-vivo model.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: