Why the study?
Does Novacor LVAS bridging alter immune homeostasis compared to medical heart failure treatment in heart transplant candidates?
Does Novacor LVAS bridging alter immune homeostasis compared to medical heart failure treatment in heart transplant candidates?
LVAS support is associated with more pronounced inflammation and temporary immunosuppression compared to advanced heart failure alone.
LVAS bridging was associated with inflammation and reduced immune cells; hypothesis-generating for infection or rejection risks before transplantation.
BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing left-ventricular assist system support, it has not been elucidated to which extent mechanical circulatory support itself as opposed to the underlying condition of endstage heart-failure contributes to perturbation of immune homeostasis. METHODS: In eleven heart transplant candidates who had to undergo Novacor left-ventricular assist device bridging, we prospectively sampled interleukin-6, T-cell and monocyte subsets and compared them to fifteen UNOS status II patients awaiting cardiac transplantation on medical heart failure treatment as outpatients at the time of LVAS implantation/listing decision as well as 2.0+/-1.2 months and 4.5+/-2.3 months later. In order to assess deviations in both groups from normal values, thirty-two healthy subjects served as reference group. RESULTS: Patients undergoing Novacor bridging had higher C-reactive protein, leukocyte, neutrophil, and monocyte levels at all three times, and exhibited lower CD3 +, CD4+, CD3+/CD45 RO T-cell and natural killer cell counts than medically treated patients awaiting transplantation 2 months after the LVAS implantation/listing decision. In comparison to controls, both groups had higher levels of inflammatory activation and lower levels of immunocompetence at all three times. CONCLUSIONS: While both groups of endstage heart failure patients show immunological alterations compared to controls, patients who have to be bridged by the Novacor LVAS exhibit a more pronounced activation of inflammatory markers. This may be due to more advanced heart failure but the device itself also may contribute to more pronounced inflammation and a temporary suppression of immunocompetent cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: