Key result
Malignant brain tumors induce a hypercoagulable state, and the perceived risk of perioperative intracranial bleeding with antithrombotic prophylaxis appears not to be justified by available evidence.
Why the study?
Does antithrombotic prophylaxis and therapy safely prevent venous thromboembolism in patients with primary and secondary cerebral tumors?
Does antithrombotic prophylaxis and therapy safely prevent venous thromboembolism in patients with primary and secondary cerebral tumors?
Antithrombotic prophylaxis appears safe and potentially superior to caval filters for preventing venous thromboembolism in brain tumor patients, despite historical concerns about intracranial bleeding.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Challenges historical avoidance of antithrombotic prophylaxis in brain tumors; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm safety.
Venous thromboembolism commonly affects patients receiving treatment for primary and secondary cerebral tumors. We review the recent literature on the molecular mechanisms underlying this hypercoagulable state and clinical studies of antithrombotic prophylaxis and therapy in this population. A computerized search of the MEDLINE database for articles from 1966 to the present day. Keywords/search terms used were glioma, astrocytoma, glioblastoma multiforme, cerebral tumor, primary brain tumour, secondary brain tumour, venous thromboembolism, thromboprophylaxis, heparin, warfarin, anticoagulants, and caval filters. Although neurological deficit has been identified as an independent risk factor for thrombosis it is also clear that malignant brain tumors induce changes in the makeup of circulating blood, making it more likely to clot. Concern for the perceived risk of perioperative intracranial bleeding with antithrombotic prophylaxis appears not to be justified by the available evidence. Prospective assessment of low molecular weight heparins for prophylaxis and treatment of established thrombosis is required. Antithrombotic therapy may also offer advantages over intracaval devices in prevention of secondary pulmonary embolism in patients with brain tumors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walsh et al. (2001) conducted a review in Primary and secondary cerebral tumors. Antithrombotic prophylaxis and therapy was evaluated. Malignant brain tumors induce a hypercoagulable state, and the perceived risk of perioperative intracranial bleeding with antithrombotic prophylaxis appears not to be justified by available evidence.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: