Key result
Malignancy was an independent predictor of target lesion revascularization within 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention (HR 2.28; 95% CI 1.3-4.0; P=0.004).
Why the study?
Does a history of cancer increase the risk of target lesion revascularization in patients undergoing PCI?
Cohort
Does a history of cancer increase the risk of target lesion revascularization in patients undergoing PCI?
Hazard Ratio: 2.28 (95% CI 1.3–4)
p-value: p=0.004
A current or recent history of cancer is a significant independent predictor of recurrent coronary atherosclerosis requiring target lesion revascularization within 1 year after PCI.
Heightened post-PCI event rates in cancer survivors merit attention; Level 4 data leave open optimal cardio-oncology strategies.
Aims: With the advancement in successfully treating different types of cancers, there is an immediate and increased need to focus on the risk and complexity of treating cardiovascular events in cancer survivors. This has led to the emergence of onco-cardiology/cardio-oncology field. We examined the varying incidence of cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with or without cancer. Methods and results: Participants were divided into a non-malignant group and a malignant group, consisting of patients who were receiving or had ever received cancer treatment. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 1 year of PCI. In the patient groups studied, we showed that the malignant group had a significantly higher probability of TLR than the non-malignant group (P = 0.002). Moreover, proportional hazards analyses identified malignancy as an independent predictor of TLR [hazard ratio (HR) 2.28, 95% confidential interval (CI) 1.3-4.0; P = 0.004]. Combining malignancy status with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels further increased the HR for TLR (HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.57-5.76; P = 0.001), and the net reclassification improvement was significant (15.2%, 95% CI 4.3-26%; P = 0.02). Time since completion of cancer treatment had an impact on the rate of TLR, with those patients with a current or recent cancer history having more TLR events within 1 year. Conclusion: We demonstrated a significant association between the recent history of cancer and the risk of recurrent coronary atherosclerosis in patients undergoing PCI and showed that malignancy status can predict the likelihood of cardiovascular events following this procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sueta et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Current or history of cancer vs. No history of cancer was evaluated on Target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 1 year of PCI (HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.3-4.0, p=0.004). Malignancy was an independent predictor of target lesion revascularization within 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention (HR 2.28; 95% CI 1.3-4.0; P=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: