Key result
TAVI simulation on living tissue-engineered biohybrid aortic valves caused severe damage to seeded cells during crimping, suggesting this strategy should be reconsidered.
Why the study?
Does the TAVI crimping process damage cells in living tissue-engineered biohybrid aortic valves?
Does the TAVI crimping process damage cells in living tissue-engineered biohybrid aortic valves?
The crimping process required for TAVI causes severe damage to living cells on tissue-engineered biohybrid valves, challenging the feasibility of this approach.
Crimping-induced cell damage in living biohybrid valves cautions against immediate translation; leaves open whether modified designs can preserve viability.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a fast-growing, exciting field of invasive therapy. During the last years many innovations significantly improved this technique. However, the prostheses are still associated with drawbacks. The aim of this study was to create cell-seeded biohybrid aortic valves (BAVs) as an ideal implant by combination of assets of biological and artificial materials. Furthermore, the influence of TAVI procedure on tissue-engineered BAV was investigated. BAV (n=6) were designed with decellularized homograft cusps and polyurethane walls. They were seeded with fibroblasts and endothelial cells isolated from saphenous veins. Consecutively, BAV were conditioned under low pulsatile flow (500 mL/min) for 5 days in a specialized bioreactor. After conditioning, TAVI-simulation was performed. The procedure was concluded with re-perfusion of the BAV for 2 days at an increased pulsatile flow (1100 mL/min). Functionality was assessed by video-documentation. Samples were taken after each processing step and evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), immunohistochemical staining (IHC), and Live/Dead-assays. The designed BAV were fully functioning and displayed physiologic behavior. After cell seeding, static cultivation and first conditioning, confluent cell layers were observed in SEM. Additionally, IHC indicated the presence of endothelial cells and fibroblasts. A significant construction of extracellular matrix was detected after the conditioning phase. However, a large number of lethal cells were observed after crimping by Live/Dead staining. Analysis revealed that the cells while still being present directly after crimping were removed in subsequent perfusion. Extensive regions of damaged cell-layers were detected by SEM-analysis substantiating these findings. Furthermore, increased ICAM expression was detected after re-perfusion as manifestation of inflammatory reaction. The approach to generate biohybrid valves is promising. However, damages inflicted during the crimping process seem not to be immediately detectable. Due to severe impacts on seeded cells, the strategy of living TE valves for TAVI should be reconsidered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koenig et al. (2016) studied Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) (n=6). TAVI simulation (crimping and reperfusion) was evaluated on Functionality and cell viability assessed by SEM, IHC, and Live/Dead-assays. TAVI simulation on living tissue-engineered biohybrid aortic valves caused severe damage to seeded cells during crimping, suggesting this strategy should be reconsidered.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: