Why the study?
Potential risk factors for early failure of bovine jugular vein conduit (Contegra) implantation for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction remained to be determined.
Does an oversized bovine jugular vein conduit increase the risk of early adverse outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing RVOT reconstruction?
Cohort (n=115)
No
Does an oversized bovine jugular vein conduit increase the risk of early adverse outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing RVOT reconstruction?
In pediatric patients undergoing RVOT reconstruction, oversized bovine jugular vein conduits (indexed size >1.905 mm/kg) significantly increase the risk of early failure, explantation, or death.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant smaller indexed Contegra conduits; leaves open optimal RVOT sizing strategy.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated potential risk factors for early failure of bovine jugular vein conduit (Contegra®) implantation for right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective review of 115 consecutive patients (54 males) who underwent RVOT reconstruction with Contegra between 2016 and 2019 was performed. Overall survival, explantation-free survival and freedom from significant RVOT lesions (valve regurgitation ≥ moderate or flow velocity ≥3.5 m/s) were investigated. RESULTS: Median age, body weight and Contegra diameter were 10.3 months [interquartile range (IQR) 5.7-26.9 months], 7.8 kg (IQR 6.3-12.4 kg) and 14 mm (IQR 12-16 mm), respectively. During the median follow-up duration of 25.1 months, there were 7 deaths, 34 significant RVOT lesions, 10 endocarditis episodes and 15 explantations. Overall survival and explantation-free survival at 3 years were 94.8% and 78.4%, respectively. Significant RVOT lesions (n = 34) comprised 20 stenoses, 8 regurgitations and 6 combined lesions. Freedom from significant RVOT lesions at 3 years was 62.6%. Cox regression identified higher indexed Contegra size (Contegra diameter/body weight, mm/kg) as the only risk factor for decreased time to explantation or death (hazard ratio 2.32, P < 0.001) and time to significant RVOT lesions development (hazard ratio 2.75, P < 0.001). The cut-off value of indexed Contegra size for significant RVOT lesions at 12 months was 1.905 mm/kg (sensitivity, 0.75; specificity, 0.78; area under the curve, 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of RVOT reconstruction using Contegra were acceptable. However, oversized Contegra should be avoided when possible. IRB APPROVAL DATE: 26 October 2020. IRB REGISTRATION NUMBER: S2020-2505-0001.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction (n=115). Higher indexed Contegra size was evaluated on Decreased time to explantation or death (HR 2.32, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: