Key result
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting did not significantly differ from on-pump CABG in creatinine clearance at discharge (75.73 vs 79.07 mL/min; p=0.609).
Why the study?
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improve creatinine clearance compared to on-pump CABG in patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery?
Population
119 patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery
Comparison
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting vs On-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
until hospital discharge
Authors
Loading...
No difference in discharge creatinine clearance should not alter technique selection; leaves open effects on clinical renal outcomes.
Cohort (n=119)
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improve creatinine clearance compared to on-pump CABG in patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 75.73% vs 79.07%
p-value: p=0.609
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting does not significantly improve postoperative creatinine clearance compared to on-pump CABG.
Breda et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring bypass surgery (n=119). Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) vs. On-pump CABG (on-CAB) was evaluated on Creatinine clearance at discharge (p=0.609). Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting did not significantly differ from on-pump CABG in creatinine clearance at discharge (75.73 vs 79.07 mL/min; p=0.609).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: