Key result
Off-pump CABG is linked to a ~71% smaller postoperative creatinine rise versus conventional CABG.
Why the study?
Cardiopulmonary bypass during CABG is known to influence renal function and may cause renal failure, and CABG without CPB may preserve perioperative renal function.
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting preserve perioperative renal function compared to conventional CABG?
Cohort (n=105)
No
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting preserve perioperative renal function compared to conventional CABG?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.16% vs 0.56%
p-value: p=0.01
Off-pump CABG provides superior perioperative renal protection and enables earlier recovery compared to conventional CABG.
OPCAB may better preserve perioperative renal function than on-pump CABG in matched patients; leaves open need for randomized outcome trials.
It is well known that the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) influences renal function and occasionally results in renal failure following cardiac surgery. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without CPB may avoid this and preserve the perioperative renal function. The present study enrolled 52 patients undergoing CABG without CPB (OPCAB group) and matched them for renal function and prognostic variables with 53 patients undergoing conventional CABG (CABG group). Perioperative renal function and early clinical results were assessed. The OPCAB group had significantly less increase in creatinine levels (0.16 +/- 0.05 vs 0.45 +/- 0.06 mg/dl; p = 0.01) and greater creatinine clearance (81.6 +/- 7.3 vs 56.3 +/- 4.8ml/min; p = 0.01) postoperatively. Postoperative recovery of free water clearance was more prompt in the OPCAB group. The duration of intubation and intensive care unit stay was significantly shorter, and the creatine kinase-MB release and blood transfusion requirements were significantly less in the OPCAB group. The OPCAB technique preserved glomerular filtration rate and prevented the increase in creatinine levels. The results suggest that the technique enables earlier patient recovery and gives superior renal protection compared with conventional CABG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayashida et al. (2002) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring surgical revascularization (n=105). Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) vs. Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass was evaluated on Postoperative increase in serum creatinine (p=0.01). Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting significantly attenuated the postoperative increase in serum creatinine compared to conventional CABG (0.16 vs 0.56 mg/dl, p=0.01) and preserved creatinine clearance.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: