Theoretical analysis demonstrates deterministic energy conversion via outermost electron potential shifts in generator coils, indicating virtual particles are unnecessary.
Relying on the core system of the Light Origin Theory, this paper reconstructs the underlying micro mechanism of electromagnetic induction in hydropower generation. It completely abandons various virtual particle hypotheses introduced by traditional physics and establishes a deterministic physical model based on real energy conversion logic. This paper clearly proves that there is no behavior of electrons absorbing or emitting particles during the electromagnetic induction power generation process, and the structure of the electron itself remains constant all the time. The real physical mechanism is as follows: the rotor drives the excitation magnet to generate an alternating magnetic field, which acts on the stator closed coil through space. The Lorentz force continuously does work on the free electrons of copper atoms inside the coil to raise the electric potential energy of free electrons relative to the atomic nucleus. When high-energy level free electrons spontaneously fall back to the low energy level, the accumulated electric potential energy is converted into discrete energy packets, which are transmitted step by step and directionally along the closed coil, forming the micro transmission form of electric energy. This paper clarifies the physical division of labor in the electron arrangement of copper atoms: a copper atom has a total of 29 extranuclear electrons, among which 28 are inner bound electrons, which are strongly constrained by the atomic nucleus and cannot participate in electromagnetic energy conversion. Forcibly disturbing them will destroy the atomic structure. Only one outermost free electron has the ability of potential energy lifting, energy releasing and energy transmitting, which is the only micro energy carrier of electromagnetic induction. The whole mechanism strictly follows the law of energy conservation, with a completely closed logic, and fundamentally clarifies the unified nature of electromagnetic energy conversion in hydropower generation, electric motors and transformers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiaqing Yan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: