Key result
Disruption of the CELO fibre 1 gene resulted in a virus (CELOdF1) that lost CAR-specific transduction in human cells and had dramatically impaired replication in chicken embryos.
The avian adenovirus CELO utilizes CAR as a cellular receptor via its long fibre 1, which is essential for human cell transduction and in vivo replication, while fibre 2 is essential for viral growth.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CELO fibre 1 is essential for CAR-dependent transduction; extends adenovirus entry studies but leaves open vector applications in humans.
The coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) is a high affinity receptor used by adenoviruses, including adenovirus type 5 (Ad5). The adenovirus fibre molecule bears the high affinity cell binding domain of Ad5, allowing virions to attach to CAR. The avian adenovirus CELO displays two fibre molecules on its capsid and it was logical to expect that the cell binding functions of CELO might also reside in one or both of these fibres. We had previously shown that the cell binding properties of CELO resemble Ad5, suggesting that the two viruses use similar receptors. Experiments with CAR-deficient CHO cells and CHO cells modified to express CAR demonstrated that CELO has CAR-dependent transduction behaviour like Ad5. Mutations were introduced into the CELO genome to disrupt either the long fibre 1 or the short fibre 2. A CELO genome with fibre 2 disrupted did not generate virus, demonstrating that fibre 2 is essential for some stage in virus growth, assembly or spread. However, a CELO genome with disrupted fibre 1 gene produced virus (CELOdF1) that was capable of entering chicken cells, but had lost both the ability to efficiently transduce human cells and the CAR-specific transduction displayed by wild-type CELO. The ability of CELOdF1 to transduce chicken cells suggests that CELOdF1 may still bind, probably via fibre 2, to a receptor expressed on avian but not mammalian cells. CELOdF1 replication was dramatically impaired in chicken embryos, demonstrating that fibre 1 is important for the in vivo biology of CELO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2001) studied Avian adenovirus CELO infection. CELO genome with disrupted fibre 1 gene (CELOdF1) vs. Wild-type CELO was evaluated on CAR-specific transduction and viral replication. Disruption of the CELO fibre 1 gene resulted in a virus (CELOdF1) that lost CAR-specific transduction in human cells and had dramatically impaired replication in chicken embryos.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: