Key result
In an in vitro model, incubation with Heparin+DAPT significantly reduced stent thrombus burden compared to DMSO control (4.5% vs 12.1%, p<0.01).
Why the study?
Stent thrombosis is a significant complication after PCI, but preclinical models to rapidly screen and validate therapeutic compounds for efficacy are lacking.
An in vitro bench-top model successfully recapitulates clinical observations of stent thrombosis related to malapposition, stent design, and antithrombotic therapies, providing a tool for preclinical screening.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not alter clinical antithrombotic practice; extends in vitro models for preclinical stent thrombosis screening.
Stent thrombosis remains an infrequent but significant complication following percutaneous coronary intervention. Preclinical models to rapidly screen and validate therapeutic compounds for efficacy are lacking. Herein, we describe a reproducible, high throughput and cost-effective method to evaluate candidate therapeutics and devices for either treatment or propensity to develop stent thrombosis in an in vitro bench-top model. Increasing degree of stent malapposition (0.00 mm, 0.10 mm, 0.25 mm and 0.50 mm) was associated with increasing thrombosis and luminal area occlusion (4.1 ± 0.5%, 6.3 ± 0.5%, 19.7 ± 4.5%, and 92.6 ± 7.4%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Differences in stent design in the form of bare-metal, drug-eluting, and bioresorbable vascular scaffolds demonstrated differences in stent thrombus burden (14.7 ± 3.8% vs. 20.5 ± 3.1% vs. 86.8 ± 5.3%, p < 0.01, respectively). Finally, thrombus burden was significantly reduced when healthy blood samples were incubated with Heparin, ASA/Ticagrelor (DAPT), and Heparin+DAPT compared to control (DMSO) at 4.1 ± 0.6%, 6.9 ± 1.7%, 4.5 ± 1.2%, and 12.1 ± 1.8%, respectively (p < 0.01). The reported model produces high throughput reproducible thrombosis results across a spectrum of antithrombotic agents, stent design, and degrees of apposition. Importantly, performance recapitulates clinical observations of antiplatelet/antithrombotic regimens as well as device and deployment characteristics. Accordingly, this model may serve as a screening tool for candidate therapies in preclinical evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perry‐Nguyen et al. (2019) studied Stent thrombosis. Antithrombotic agents (Heparin, DAPT) vs. Control (DMSO) was evaluated on Thrombus burden (p=<0.01). In an in vitro model, incubation with Heparin+DAPT significantly reduced stent thrombus burden compared to DMSO control (4.5% vs 12.1%, p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: