Key result
The IEGM-based method for optimizing interventricular delay closely correlated with the standard echocardiographic method in prospective and retrospective cohorts.
Why the study?
Does an IEGM-based method for determining optimal VV delay perform similarly to an ECHO-based method in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Observational (n=72)
Does an IEGM-based method for determining optimal VV delay perform similarly to an ECHO-based method in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An IEGM-based method for optimizing VV delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy provides highly concordant results with the traditional, more time-consuming echocardiographic AVTI method.
Determination of the optimal interventricular (VV) delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy currently relies on costly, time-consuming echocardiographic (ECHO) methods. This study evaluated the performance of a new intracardiac electrogram (IEGM)-based VV method compared to the aortic velocity time integral (AVTI) method of VV delay optimization. The study included two patient groups. Eleven patients enrolled by a single center in the Rhythm II ICD trial underwent prospective comparisons of the AVTI at the VV interval determined by the IEGM VV method versus the maximum AVTI at the echocardiographically determined optimal VV delay. In 61 patients enrolled in the RHYTHM VV trial, the same testing methods were compared retrospectively. In the prospective study, the maximum AVTI by the ECHO-based method (24.3 +/- 7.9 cm), was closely correlated with maximum AVTI by the IEGM-based method (23.9 +/- 7.9 cm; concordance correlation coefficient = 0.99; 95% confidence, lower limit of 98%. Likewise, in the retrospective analysis, the ECHO-determined maximum AVTI (22.1 +/- 8.2 cm) was similar to that determined by the IEGM-based method (20.9 +/- 8.3 cm; concordance correlation coefficient = 0.98; 95% confidence, lower limit of 97%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Min et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=72). Intracardiac electrogram (IEGM)-based VV method vs. Echocardiographic (ECHO) aortic velocity time integral (AVTI) method was evaluated on Maximum aortic velocity time integral (AVTI) (concordance correlation coefficient 0.99, 95% CI lower limit of 98%). The IEGM-based method for optimizing interventricular delay closely correlated with the standard echocardiographic method in prospective and retrospective cohorts.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: