Why the study?
To evaluate endothelial function in subjects with LVADs compared with chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction on the transplant list and HT patients with normal systolic function.
Does continuous flow LVAD worsen endothelial function in subjects with chronic heart failure compared to heart transplant recipients or heart failure patients on the transplant list?
Does continuous flow LVAD worsen endothelial function in subjects with chronic heart failure compared to heart transplant recipients or heart failure patients on the transplant list?
Continuous flow LVADs do not appear to worsen endothelial function in chronic heart failure patients, with inflammation (CRP) acting as the main determinant of endothelial function in this population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LVAD status does not appear to worsen endothelial function; hypothesis-generating CRP link requires prospective confirmation before practice implications.
AIMS: To evaluate endothelial function in subjects with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), comparing them with subjects with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on the list for heart transplant (HT) and with HT patients with a normal systolic cardiac function to identify any differences. METHODS: We enrolled 28 subjects with LVAD, 55 subjects with HT, and 42 subjects with heart failure on the transplant list. The subjects underwent a general physical examination, assessment of laboratory blood parameters, and assessment of endothelial function through flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of brachial artery. RESULTS: The three groups were homogeneous as regards age, gender, smoke abuse, C-reactive protein (CRP) and FMD parameters (P = ns). In LVAD group percentage of FMD change showed an inverse correlation with CRP (rho: -0.5, P: 0.003), a well-known marker of inflammation and tissue damage. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous flow related to LVAD seems to not worsen endothelial function. Endothelial function was not affected by cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes, obesity, and tobacco habit), by the functional status expressed by New York Heart Association class, by the left ventricular systolic function and by the presence or absence of ischaemic heart disease in all the populations analysed. CRP was the only factor able to influence percentage of FMD change in patient with LVAD, reinforcing the hypothesis that inflammation is the main determinant of endothelial function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cortese et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: