Why the study?
Does percutaneous transluminal angioplasty improve clinical outcomes and ulcer healing in patients with severe leg ischaemia?
Does percutaneous transluminal angioplasty improve clinical outcomes and ulcer healing in patients with severe leg ischaemia?
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is an effective method for treating severe leg ischaemia, particularly for achieving ulcer healing, and angiographic restenosis is often clinically unimportant.
May support PTA for ulcer healing in severe leg ischaemia despite restenosis; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
The role of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the management of severe leg ischaemia is controversial. To investigate further the efficacy of angioplasty and the clinical consequences of restenosis, a randomly selected cohort of 29 patients with ischaemic rest pain or ulceration was studied for 6 months after a technically successful balloon angioplasty. All patients had digital subtraction arteriography at the end of follow-up. Seven of 15 patients undergoing the procedure for rest pain had sustained relief from the initial dilatation. Partial or complete healing was noted in all 14 patients with ulceration and was maintained at 6 months in 11 despite significant (greater than 30 per cent) restenosis at the angioplasty site in eight. There were no complications or clinical deterioration associated with the procedure. Angioplasty is an effective method for treating the severely ischaemic leg, especially when used to achieve ulcer healing; restenosis is often clinically unimportant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ray et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: